For developers & AI power users
GPT, Claude, and Grok draft independently, debate on evidence, and converge on one answer you can verify — not one model's confident guess.
Free to try · Pro is $4.99/mo — bring your own keys, no token markup
How it works
Instead of one black box, your question goes to several models that work like a panel of experts — independently, then together.
Each model answers on its own, with no peer anchoring. Different strengths surface different angles — diversity is the asset.
The models see each other's answers and challenge the reasoning. Only points backed by a recomputation, counterexample, or citation survive.
The strongest, validity-checked answer is assembled — disagreements resolved on merit, not on whichever model sounds most confident.
Read-heavy workloads usually favor optimistic locks.
Draft readyContention rate and retry cost should decide.
Draft readyMeasure conflict frequency before choosing a default.
Draft readyLow contention makes retries cheaper than blocking.
Pessimistic locking is always the safer default.
Prefer optimistic locking at low contention. Switch when the cost of repeated conflicts exceeds the cost of blocking.
What you get
Auto picks the effort. Council merges independent answers. Debate makes the models argue it out. Compare shows all three side by side.
Watch the council draft, debate, and converge live — with verdict chips showing what was verified, disputed, or revised.
On Pro you connect your own provider keys and pay them directly. We never mark up your tokens.
Measured on GPQA, MMLU-Pro and GSM8K against each model alone — the numbers are public.
The proof
+45.7 percentage points on hard sets
On hard reasoning sets, orchestration recovered answers that every individual model got wrong. See the full methodology and per-category results.
See full benchmark →Sign in to pick up where you left off — or create an account and run your first multi-model answer in under a minute.